by David M Pearce
Having dealt exhaustively with the theology of salvation by faith, the apostle now spends three chapters on the position of Israel in the purpose of God. Chapter nine looks at Israel in the past, chapter ten at Israel in the present and chapter eleven at Israel in the future.
v1-3) You might suppose by now that Paul was so preoccupied with his calling to preach to Gentiles that he had no time for his fellow Jews. Here he swears that is not true. Daily he grieved over their hard heartedness in rejecting his gospel. He even rhetorically wishes he could sacrifice his own place in the Kingdom if it would somehow bring more Jews to believe in Jesus. This mirrors the plea of Moses when he appeals to God to forgive Israel in Exodus 32:31,32
v4,5) The apostle lists all the advantages the Jews had. As his chosen people, God had carefully prepared them for the coming of Christ the saviour, who sprang from their midst, and for whose appearing God deserves eternal praise.
v6,7) It might appear that God’s plan for Israel has dismally failed. But he never expected all Israel to be saved. Just being a Jew, a descendant of Abraham, does not save you. Paul gives an obvious example. Abraham had two sons. Both were descended from Abraham. But only Isaac was counted by God as his seed, and Ishmael was rejected. So, God has been choosing out of Israel a minority who would believe in him.
v8,9) Ishmael was born ‘of the flesh’ when Abraham went to bed with Hagar, Sarah’s servant. The birth of Isaac was different. He was a child of promise. He only came into existence when, as the angel foretold a year before his birth, God rejuvenated his elderly parents to conceive and bear a child. It is God’s grace, not human descent, which saves us.
v10-12) Paul produces another example of God selecting who should be the seed of Abraham. Rebekah, after years of fruitless marriage to Isaac, became pregnant with twins. When she enquired of the Lord, she was told the older one would serve the younger (Genesis 25:23). God had already decided that Jacob, not Esau, would inherit the promises to Abraham. Paul says that God’s choice did not reflect the good or bad deeds of the two boys, because they were not yet born. Salvation does not depend on being good, but on the mercy of God.
v13) Another quotation, this time from Malachi 1:2,3. God chose Jacob’s descendants, not Esau’s, as his people, and already by the time of Malachi the land of Edom was in irrecoverable decline.
v14) in our world of ‘human rights’ it could be argued that God is not fair to choose some people and not others. Should we not all have the chance of the Kingdom? No, says, Paul, God cannot be unjust.
v15,16) As the Creator, God has the prerogative to decide who he wishes to work with. In the revelation of his Name to Moses, God insisted we are all sinners and worthy to die, but he chooses to have mercy on some, on those who show humility and repentance. Even then, we do not deserve his kindness. We cannot earn it. ‘It does not depend on human desire or exertion, but on God who shows mercy’ (NET).
v17,18) In contrast, Pharaoh king of Egypt defied God. His pride drove him to refuse freedom to God’s people. He had the opportunity to let the people go at Moses’ request, but he hardened his heart (Exodus 7:13, 8:15). In the end, God directly hardened Pharaoh’s heart, so that he was no longer free to decide until God had demonstrated to the world what happens when you defy him (Exodus 10:1).
v19) It might appear that God is quite arbitrary in his dealings with us - adopting some as his sons and daughters, and leaving others to perish in the grave. <
The apostle has exhausted his analogy of slaves and their masters in chapter six. He now turns to another figure of speech to show we must leave the Law of Moses behind when we become Christians.
He reminds his readers that a when a woman marries, she vows to be faithful to her husband until death. But if her husband dies, that obligation ends, and she is free to marry another man.
Verse 3If her husband is alive and she lives with another man she becomes an adulteress. But if after he dies, she decides to marry again, that is fine.
Verse 4In a difficult interpretation of the analogy, Paul argues that his readers, especially his Jewish brothers (‘my brothers’), were once ‘married’ to the Law of Moses. When Christ died on the cross, they died, too. At that point they were no longer bound to the Law. When Jesus rose from the dead, they rose to a new life with him. Now they are ‘married’ to him, as to a new husband. This new marriage will bear as children, ‘fruit for God’.
Verse 5Before our conversion, we were living ‘in the flesh’. The choices we made were prompted by our human nature. The fruit of those passions was death.
Verse 6In contrast, having no commitments now to the Law of Moses, we are driven, not by the flesh (human nature), but by the Spirit, the way of God.
Another question. Does Paul believe that the Law is bad, because breaking it produces sin? Another denial. No, he says. All the Law does is to tell me when I am sinning. It did not make me sin.
Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright ©2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved